<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profitable Prospectin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/</link>
	<description>Pimpin' your bank alt since March 2008</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Just for reference here guys, I have a GIANT database of prospecting because im weird and I like to make databases.  I've prospected about 20,000 ore and have received a droprate of 89% rare gems per stack of ore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for reference here guys, I have a GIANT database of prospecting because im weird and I like to make databases.  I&#8217;ve prospected about 20,000 ore and have received a droprate of 89% rare gems per stack of ore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphonia</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Taking this from one of the top Jewelcrafters on my server (I've got all the patterns except a few due to rep and I've made probably close to 20k on the profession), you really make more money from prospecting if you are in fact a jewelcrafter yourself, ideally an enchanter jewelcrafter. Enchanting comes into play if you actually use your dust to make Braided Eternium Chains and in turn disenchant them for shards. 

Back on topic... For all gems including the dreaded talasite, there is a cut gem, if not 5 or 6 cuts, that are worth more than the material itself (which is a weird thing for professions). Taking it that a step further, if you've unlocked the alchemy lab with SSO, epic gems are also worth quite a bit more cut than uncut. I estimate there could be opportunities to make huge PROFIT margins (35G and up, possibly even 125G) per gem just from cutting the material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking this from one of the top Jewelcrafters on my server (I&#8217;ve got all the patterns except a few due to rep and I&#8217;ve made probably close to 20k on the profession), you really make more money from prospecting if you are in fact a jewelcrafter yourself, ideally an enchanter jewelcrafter. Enchanting comes into play if you actually use your dust to make Braided Eternium Chains and in turn disenchant them for shards. </p>
<p>Back on topic&#8230; For all gems including the dreaded talasite, there is a cut gem, if not 5 or 6 cuts, that are worth more than the material itself (which is a weird thing for professions). Taking it that a step further, if you&#8217;ve unlocked the alchemy lab with SSO, epic gems are also worth quite a bit more cut than uncut. I estimate there could be opportunities to make huge PROFIT margins (35G and up, possibly even 125G) per gem just from cutting the material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miyuji</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Miyuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-352</guid>
		<description>To Tainha:

The probabilities are based off of exactly four prospects. Imagine a coin being flipped. 50% and 50% are our two probabilities, but if we flip it twice, we have three possible outcomes, HH = 25% HT or TH = 50% and TT = 25%. We treat the HT and TH as the same because for our purposes say we are looking for heads (aka blue gems) whether it comes on the first flip or the second it is still just 1 head (blue gem).

So when I say 0 out of 4 I mean that you have a 40.96% chance of getting no blue gems when prospecting four times. you must prospect four time to get this % of probability. Propecting once or twice or three time will all have different % probabilities for each potential outcome.

But let me make it SIMPLE.

All the proababilities above are based off of four propects, while fun to calculate for the layman IT DOES NOT MATTER! when wowhead says approx 22%, over the course of 100's of prospects, YOU WILL PRODUCE A BLUE GEM 22% OF THE TIME.

The %'s or probabilities above are merely number expressing your odds when we go into multiple propects, similar to the coin toss. Over the course of dozens of stacks prospected, some producing 1, some 2, a couple stacks producing 3 blue gems and the rare stack producing 4 blue gems, when you take the number of gems add them up and divide by the number of propects it will equal 22%. 

This whole conversation started with some people applying partial probabilites combination math and coming up with a number no one could understand. I had hoped to clear up the math and the odds on four prospects or a stack of ore, but i think i may have just confused some of you.

FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOING MATH TO FIGURE WHETHER A STACK OF ORE IS WORTH BUYING LOOK AT THE ABOVE COMMENT.

and yes Will, the math is the same as I use personally, which to be honest has nothing to do with probabilities math. Odds change the more times we flip a coin, however in the long run the averages will always be 50% and 50% for a single coin toss. The same applies for the a prospect, 22% each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Tainha:</p>
<p>The probabilities are based off of exactly four prospects. Imagine a coin being flipped. 50% and 50% are our two probabilities, but if we flip it twice, we have three possible outcomes, HH = 25% HT or TH = 50% and TT = 25%. We treat the HT and TH as the same because for our purposes say we are looking for heads (aka blue gems) whether it comes on the first flip or the second it is still just 1 head (blue gem).</p>
<p>So when I say 0 out of 4 I mean that you have a 40.96% chance of getting no blue gems when prospecting four times. you must prospect four time to get this % of probability. Propecting once or twice or three time will all have different % probabilities for each potential outcome.</p>
<p>But let me make it SIMPLE.</p>
<p>All the proababilities above are based off of four propects, while fun to calculate for the layman IT DOES NOT MATTER! when wowhead says approx 22%, over the course of 100&#8217;s of prospects, YOU WILL PRODUCE A BLUE GEM 22% OF THE TIME.</p>
<p>The %&#8217;s or probabilities above are merely number expressing your odds when we go into multiple propects, similar to the coin toss. Over the course of dozens of stacks prospected, some producing 1, some 2, a couple stacks producing 3 blue gems and the rare stack producing 4 blue gems, when you take the number of gems add them up and divide by the number of propects it will equal 22%. </p>
<p>This whole conversation started with some people applying partial probabilites combination math and coming up with a number no one could understand. I had hoped to clear up the math and the odds on four prospects or a stack of ore, but i think i may have just confused some of you.</p>
<p>FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOING MATH TO FIGURE WHETHER A STACK OF ORE IS WORTH BUYING LOOK AT THE ABOVE COMMENT.</p>
<p>and yes Will, the math is the same as I use personally, which to be honest has nothing to do with probabilities math. Odds change the more times we flip a coin, however in the long run the averages will always be 50% and 50% for a single coin toss. The same applies for the a prospect, 22% each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Miyuji:

In the post you linked, Maxxer writes:

"You have 22% to get a blue gem from a prospect of 5 adamantite ore. “A” blue gem is worth 30.9, and 30.9 times 0.22 equals 6.8. So prospecting 5 ore is worth 6.8 gold in our example. That makes our average return on &lt;strong&gt;a stack of adamantite ore (20 ore) 6.8 * 4 = 27.2 gold&lt;/strong&gt;. I wouldn’t buy ore if I had less than a 10% margin on just the blue gems, so I’d buy stacks of 24g or less in this example. However, see the ‘Demand and Supply' part before you buy out 70 stacks of adamantite ore. For me prospecting accounts for approximately 35% of my JC profit. "

He is also multiplying his result by 4 (to get expected value of prospecting 20 adamantite ore), so essentially, his math is the same as mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miyuji:</p>
<p>In the post you linked, Maxxer writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;You have 22% to get a blue gem from a prospect of 5 adamantite ore. “A” blue gem is worth 30.9, and 30.9 times 0.22 equals 6.8. So prospecting 5 ore is worth 6.8 gold in our example. That makes our average return on <strong>a stack of adamantite ore (20 ore) 6.8 * 4 = 27.2 gold</strong>. I wouldn’t buy ore if I had less than a 10% margin on just the blue gems, so I’d buy stacks of 24g or less in this example. However, see the ‘Demand and Supply&#8217; part before you buy out 70 stacks of adamantite ore. For me prospecting accounts for approximately 35% of my JC profit. &#8221;</p>
<p>He is also multiplying his result by 4 (to get expected value of prospecting 20 adamantite ore), so essentially, his math is the same as mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tainha</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Tainha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-339</guid>
		<description>miyuji, your math scares me.

"probability of 0 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%"
"probability of 4 out of 4 = .0016 or .16%"

You are telling us that if you don't prospect any ore you have more chances to get a gem than prospecting 4 times in a row?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>miyuji, your math scares me.</p>
<p>&#8220;probability of 0 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%&#8221;<br />
&#8220;probability of 4 out of 4 = .0016 or .16%&#8221;</p>
<p>You are telling us that if you don&#8217;t prospect any ore you have more chances to get a gem than prospecting 4 times in a row?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miyuji</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>miyuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-337</guid>
		<description>oh btw for a real good guide on JC and prospecting a guy in europe wrote up a 4 page post in the european forums. He simplefies the whole math issue on prospecting. However note that it doessn't always apply to all servers, the prices he listed cost on avg 1.5x on my server making it more expenisve to level JC and the selling prices are not all that high either. too much competition and not enough people farming old world mats. his big seller the de into a large primatic shard on my server the mats go for more. sad but true.

http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=2405312046&#38;sid=1

oh also firgured out how to get a avatar! for anyone interested youll need to go to:

http://en.gravatar.com/

and register an account with your email, my understanding is that it goes acrooss all wordpress blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh btw for a real good guide on JC and prospecting a guy in europe wrote up a 4 page post in the european forums. He simplefies the whole math issue on prospecting. However note that it doessn&#8217;t always apply to all servers, the prices he listed cost on avg 1.5x on my server making it more expenisve to level JC and the selling prices are not all that high either. too much competition and not enough people farming old world mats. his big seller the de into a large primatic shard on my server the mats go for more. sad but true.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=2405312046&amp;sid=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=2405312046&amp;sid=1</a></p>
<p>oh also firgured out how to get a avatar! for anyone interested youll need to go to:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.gravatar.com/" rel="nofollow">http://en.gravatar.com/</a></p>
<p>and register an account with your email, my understanding is that it goes acrooss all wordpress blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miyuji</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>miyuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-330</guid>
		<description>mind you i believe wowhead gives the original probabilities at 3% per gem for a total of 18%, not 20%, so the above calculations are not acurate based of wowhead data... however wowhead fails to give decimal places so they could be 3.33% each and total up to 20%.. This is of course theoretical. Without the deciaml places the total probability could be of by up to 3%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mind you i believe wowhead gives the original probabilities at 3% per gem for a total of 18%, not 20%, so the above calculations are not acurate based of wowhead data&#8230; however wowhead fails to give decimal places so they could be 3.33% each and total up to 20%.. This is of course theoretical. Without the deciaml places the total probability could be of by up to 3%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miyuji</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>miyuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-329</guid>
		<description>The probabilities are as follows based on a 20% drop rate per prospect and with a total of four possible prospects the chance of a blue gem being yeilded are:

probability of 0 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%
probability of 1 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%
probability of 2 out of 4 = .1536 or 15.36%
probability of 3 out of 4 = .0256 or 2.56%
probability of 4 out of 4 = .0016 or .16%

If you are interested in the probabilities math is based on college level quantative business analysis 260 or equivalent, or poker hand chance probabilities.

(1/5)^0 x (4/5)^4 x 1 = .4096
(1/5)^1 x (4/5)^3 x 4 = .4096
(1/5)^2 x (4/5)^2 x 6 = .1536
(1/5)^3 x (4/5)^1 x 4 = .0256
(1/5)^4 x (4/5)^0 x 1 = .0016

the 1,4,6,4,1 based off of pascal triangle for possible combinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The probabilities are as follows based on a 20% drop rate per prospect and with a total of four possible prospects the chance of a blue gem being yeilded are:</p>
<p>probability of 0 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%<br />
probability of 1 out of 4 = .4096 or 40.96%<br />
probability of 2 out of 4 = .1536 or 15.36%<br />
probability of 3 out of 4 = .0256 or 2.56%<br />
probability of 4 out of 4 = .0016 or .16%</p>
<p>If you are interested in the probabilities math is based on college level quantative business analysis 260 or equivalent, or poker hand chance probabilities.</p>
<p>(1/5)^0 x (4/5)^4 x 1 = .4096<br />
(1/5)^1 x (4/5)^3 x 4 = .4096<br />
(1/5)^2 x (4/5)^2 x 6 = .1536<br />
(1/5)^3 x (4/5)^1 x 4 = .0256<br />
(1/5)^4 x (4/5)^0 x 1 = .0016</p>
<p>the 1,4,6,4,1 based off of pascal triangle for possible combinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I've made a spreadsheet to calculate the value of prospecting based on the exact numbers that Wowhead provides. I'll get it uploaded in the next day or two so you guys can use it to calculate some accurate numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made a spreadsheet to calculate the value of prospecting based on the exact numbers that Wowhead provides. I&#8217;ll get it uploaded in the next day or two so you guys can use it to calculate some accurate numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://woweconomist.com/blog/profitable-prospectin/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://woweconomist.com/blog/?p=24#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Paulo, the scale does change. Your 59.04% is the odds of getting ONE blue gem out of 20 ore. You aren't taking into account that you could get more than one blue gem per stack.

I can't easily give you a lesson in probability, but this magic 59.04% you guys are coming up with is irrelevant to our calculations. The last post was calculating the odds of getting (or not getting) ONE Badge of Justice in TEN Shattered Sun Supplies. We weren't factoring the probability of getting two badges in ten supplies, or even three badges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulo, the scale does change. Your 59.04% is the odds of getting ONE blue gem out of 20 ore. You aren&#8217;t taking into account that you could get more than one blue gem per stack.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t easily give you a lesson in probability, but this magic 59.04% you guys are coming up with is irrelevant to our calculations. The last post was calculating the odds of getting (or not getting) ONE Badge of Justice in TEN Shattered Sun Supplies. We weren&#8217;t factoring the probability of getting two badges in ten supplies, or even three badges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
